Go to the main content

I went to a movie alone on a Wednesday afternoon last month and cried in the parking lot afterward, not because the film was sad but because I'd forgotten I was allowed to choose something just for me

Solo activities don't have to earn their place in your life through productivity or circumstance—sometimes the most radical act is choosing something simply because you want it.

I went to a movie alone on a Wednesday afternoon last month and cried in the parking lot afterward, not because the film was sad but because I'd forgotten I was allowed to choose something just for me
Lifestyle

Solo activities don't have to earn their place in your life through productivity or circumstance—sometimes the most radical act is choosing something simply because you want it.

For most of my adult life, I believed that doing something alone was a kind of placeholder. Something you did when the people you wanted to do it with weren't available. I'd go to dinner alone on work trips and call it efficient. I'd take a walk alone and call it exercise. I'd read alone and call it research. The idea that I might choose something purely because I wanted it, with no one else in mind and no productive frame around it, felt almost embarrassing to admit. Like wanting was a thing you had to earn.

Then last month I went to a movie on a Wednesday afternoon. Nothing special. A film I'd been mildly curious about for weeks. I sat through it eating popcorn that was too salty, in a theatre with maybe nine other people, and when the credits rolled I walked back to my car and sat there and cried for about ten minutes. Not because the film was sad. The film was fine. I cried because I realised I hadn't done something just for me, with no other justification, in a very long time.

The conventional wisdom about being alone is mostly wrong

Most of what we hear about solitude treats it as a problem to manage. There are warnings about loneliness epidemics. There are think pieces about how isolation wrecks the nervous system. And some of that is true. Persistent isolation can lead to hypervigilance, emotional exhaustion, and elevated risk for anxiety and depression, particularly when people retreat to handle a crisis entirely on their own out of misplaced self-sufficiency. Cacioppo and colleagues' long-running work at the University of Chicago, summarised in their 2014 review in Annual Review of Psychology, documented how chronic perceived isolation alters stress reactivity, sleep architecture, and threat surveillance in measurable ways.

That's worth taking seriously. Hiding from the world is not the same thing as choosing time with yourself.

But there's a different kind of aloneness that gets flattened in this conversation. The kind that isn't avoidance. The kind that is, actually, a form of self-respect. And we don't talk about that one nearly enough, partly because the language for it has been swallowed by the language of the first kind.

Chosen solitude is a different animal

The research on this draws a sharper line than the cultural conversation does. Intentional time alone is a state of being distinct from social connection that facilitates a relationship to the self. Thuy-vy Nguyen and colleagues, in a 2018 study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, found that solitude chosen for its own sake reliably reduced high-arousal emotion (both positive and negative) and was associated with feelings of relaxation and self-regulation, while solitude experienced as imposed produced the opposite pattern. The variable that mattered was autonomy. It's not the absence of people. It's the presence of you.

That distinction matters because the word "alone" carries the weight of both. When someone says they spent the afternoon alone, we don't know if they were hiding or arriving. If they were running from something or finally letting themselves stop.

Why the choosing is the part that matters

I've been thinking a lot lately about how much of adult life gets organised around what you owe other people. Some of that is good. Most relationships involve real obligations and real care, and the people who insist on radical independence are often, as I've written about before, just protecting themselves from the cost of needing anyone.

But there's a quieter thing that happens when you spend years prioritising other people's needs, schedules, and preferences. You stop asking yourself what you want. Not because anyone forbade it. Because you forgot the question existed. The movie didn't matter. What mattered was that I'd picked it. Without consulting anyone. Without making it part of a date or a friend's birthday or a thing I could justify with a review I'd write later. I went because I wanted to. That sounds simple. It is not, in practice, simple at all.

The ways we avoid ourselves

I think a lot of people are quietly bad at this. Not because they're broken but because the structures they live inside don't reward it. Productivity culture rewards busyness. Social media rewards visibility. Relationships, even good ones, can quietly shape both partners into people who don't really know what they'd choose if no one else was choosing alongside them. The skills that actually move the needle on mental health are not dramatic. They are the slow practices of being honest with yourself about what you need and finding people who let you have it. They are also, often, the practice of being honest with yourself when no one is watching. You can't outsource the second one.

And then there's the sleep piece, which is small but real. When people are running on insufficient rest, the amygdala goes into overdrive while the prefrontal cortex struggles to regulate it. Matthew Walker and colleagues at UC Berkeley demonstrated this directly in a 2007 study published in Current Biology, finding that sleep-deprived participants showed a 60 percent amplification of amygdala reactivity to negative stimuli, alongside reduced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the medial prefrontal cortex. You become more reactive, less able to manage impulses, more prone to repetitive negative thinking. In that state, the idea of stopping to ask yourself what you actually want feels indulgent. You're just trying to get through the day.

So we don't ask. We pick the option that requires the least negotiation. We default to whatever the people around us want, or whatever the algorithm serves, or whatever the calendar already has on it. And the years go by.

The parking lot thing

The crying part surprised me more than the movie part. I'm not someone who cries often. I sat there in the car park with the windows up and didn't quite know what was happening for a minute. It wasn't grief, exactly. It was closer to the feeling you get when you find a sweater you'd assumed was lost. A small recognition. A piece of yourself you'd forgotten you owned.

I think part of what was happening is that I'd been carrying a low-grade weariness for a long time without naming it. The weariness of always being available. Always running mental calculations about other people's schedules. Always negotiating what I wanted against what would be easiest for everyone else.

And the Wednesday afternoon, in its mundane completeness, said: you don't have to do that right now. You're not on call. You picked this. It's yours.

The part nobody tells you

You don't realise how much you've been deferring until you stop. And when you stop, the first time, it can feel disproportionate. A movie shouldn't make a grown man cry in a parking lot. Except that it wasn't really about the movie. It was about the choosing.

The choosing is the muscle that atrophies. Not because anyone took it away. Because we stop using it, in small ways, for years, until one Wednesday afternoon we use it again and the body remembers something the mind had forgotten. That's what I was crying about, sitting in the car with the windows up. Not sadness. Recognition. The specific shock of realising that the version of me who knew how to want things had been waiting the whole time, patient, undamaged, just out of practice.

I'm not interested in turning this into a programme. The minute doing things for myself becomes a wellness practice with rules and a frequency, it stops being the thing it actually was that afternoon. But I have noticed myself, since then, asking a quieter question more often—not what I should do, but what I want. A coffee somewhere I haven't been. A walk along a route I picked for no reason. An afternoon with a book I'm not going to write about.

The movie was fine. The popcorn was too salty. The parking lot was concrete and slightly damp from earlier rain. None of it was special. That was the whole point. The choosing was mine, and it had been a long time, and my body knew it before my mind did.

Lachlan Brown

Lachlan Brown is a writer and editor with a background in psychology, personal development, and mindful living. As co-founder of a digital media company, he has spent years building editorial teams and shaping content strategies across publications covering everything from self-improvement to sustainability. His work sits at the intersection of behavioral psychology and everyday decision-making.

At VegOut, Lachlan writes about the psychological dimensions of food, lifestyle, and conscious living. He is interested in why we make the choices we do, how habits form around what we eat, and what it takes to sustain meaningful change. His writing draws on research in behavioral science, identity, and motivation.

Outside of work, Lachlan reads widely across psychology, philosophy, and business strategy. He is based in Singapore and believes that understanding yourself is the first step toward making better choices about how you live, what you eat, and what you value.

More Articles by Lachlan

More From Vegout