Go to the main content

Psychology says the most painful kind of loneliness in your 70s and 80s isn't the absence of company — it's the absence of a witness, the kind of person who remembers your old jokes, knows your references, and has watched your life unfold across decades, and a life without long-term witnessing is one the body slowly starts to doubt the shape of

The loneliness of your seventies isn't the absence of people. It's becoming the only remaining authority on your own existence

Lifestyle

The loneliness of your seventies isn't the absence of people. It's becoming the only remaining authority on your own existence

I want to write about my mother's oldest friend, who I'll call P, because P is the clearest example I have of what I'm trying to describe, and because P died last year, and I think about her often.

P had been my mother's friend since they were nineteen. They had met on the first day of nursing training in 1968. They had been each other's bridesmaids. They had been there for the births of each other's children. They had survived two divorces between them, several major moves, the deaths of both of their husbands, and one period of about eighteen months in the early 1980s when they hadn't been speaking for reasons neither of them could later remember.

By the time P got sick, in her late seventies, she was the only person on earth who had known my mother for the full duration of her adult life. The only person who could remember the version of my mother who had been a young nurse with a particular laugh. The only person who knew the in-jokes from the 1970s. The only person who could, when my mother started a sentence, finish it in the same cadence it would have been finished in 1974. The only person who had been, for fifty-five years, a continuous witness to my mother's life.

When P died, my mother lost something I have not, in the year and a half since, found a way to talk about adequately.

She did not lose company. She still has my father. She still has us. She still has the regular Sunday calls and the daily presence of a long marriage. By every external measure, she is, in her early seventies, well-attended-to.

What she lost was the person who could verify, in real time, that the life she had lived had actually happened.

What a witness actually does

I want to think about what a long-term witness provides, because I don't think we have very good language for it, and I think the lack of language is part of why this kind of loneliness is so hard to name when it arrives.

A long-term witness is a person who has watched your life unfold across decades. They have, in their head, a continuous memory of who you have been across time. They remember the version of you who existed at twenty-three. They remember the friends you had then. They remember the apartment you lived in. They remember the small jokes you made. They remember, often better than you do, the texture of the years that, from your own vantage point, have become slightly compressed and indistinct.

What this witness does, through the simple fact of their existence, is hold the shape of your life in a place outside your own head. Your own memory of your life is, by your seventies, an unreliable document. Decades have blended. Names have slipped. The order of events has gone soft. The sense of having had a coherent life requires, for most of us, the existence of at least one other person who can confirm, when asked, that yes, you did do that, that yes, that did happen, that yes, you have been the person you've been, across all those years.

The witness functions as a kind of external hard drive for your own selfhood. They store the version of you that you can no longer reliably store yourself. When they're alive, you don't notice this. You don't notice it because the storage is happening in the background, on autopilot, every time you talk to them. The reference comes up. The shared memory gets activated. The version of you they hold gets briefly synced with the version of you you hold, and both of you walk away with a slightly more solid sense of who you've been.

When the witness dies, the storage goes offline. The version of you that lived in their head is, in some real way, no longer accessible to anyone. You become, for the first time in your adult life, the only person who remembers what your twenties were like. The only one who remembers the dead friend you both used to laugh about. The only one who knows what the inside of the old flat looked like. The shape of your life, which had previously been confirmed by an external source, now lives only in your own increasingly unreliable head.

This produces a particular kind of disorientation. Researchers studying loneliness in older adults have found that the loss of long-term relational ties affects identity in ways that newer relationships, however warm, cannot easily compensate for. The newer people don't have the file. They never saw the original. They are loving you, in many cases very much, but they are loving the version of you that exists in front of them now. The continuous version, the one that ran from nineteen to seventy-three, has nowhere to live anymore.

The body that starts to doubt

I want to describe what I noticed in my mother, in the months after P died, because the description is more useful than any abstract argument.

My mother became, briefly and disorientingly, less sure of her own past. She would tell stories from the 1970s and stop halfway through, unsure of a detail. She would mention old friends and then say, with a small confusion in her voice, "Or maybe that was someone else." She would pull out old photographs and look at them with a slightly different expression than she used to—an expression that suggested, on some level, that the events depicted in the photographs had become slightly less real to her now that there was no one living who had been there to confirm them.

I don't want to overstate this. My mother is not, in any clinical sense, struggling with her memory. She is sharp. She is functional. She remembers everything that needs to be remembered for her to live her life.

What I'm describing is something subtler. It's the body's quiet recalibration when the external storage of the self becomes unavailable. The body, when it can no longer cross-reference its own past with another body that lived through it, begins to hold its own past slightly more tentatively. The shape of the life becomes less solid. The certainty that one was, in fact, the person one was, becomes a small ongoing question rather than a settled fact.

This is what I think people in their seventies and eighties are pointing at when they describe a particular kind of loneliness that has nothing to do with how many people are around them. It is the loneliness of having become, late in life, the only remaining authority on one's own existence.

Why the new people can't fill it

I want to address something directly, because the obvious response to what I'm describing is: well, make new friends. Surround your aging parents with company. Get them into a community. The loneliness, in this view, is a function of solitude, and the fix is more contact.

The fix is partial at best. The research on loneliness consistently finds that the subjective experience of belonging matters more than the objective volume of contact. You can have plenty of company and still be lonely if the company doesn't have the file on you.

The new people, however warm, are starting from year one. They are meeting your seventy-three-year-old mother. They have no access to the twenty-three-year-old version. They cannot, when she mentions an old reference, complete the joke. They cannot, when she alludes to a song from 1972, hum it back. They are, by structural necessity, holding only the very recent version of her, which is, in the long arc of her life, a thin slice.

This is not their fault. It's not a failure of the new relationships. It's just the math of how long it takes to become a long-term witness. To know someone for fifty years, you have to have known them for fifty years. There is no shortcut. The new friends in your seventies cannot, structurally, be what the old friends were, because the time required is no longer available.

What you can do, for an aging parent who has lost their long-term witnesses, is something more modest than replacement. You can become a partial witness yourself. You can ask about the old times. You can listen to the stories you've already heard, knowing that the telling is the point, not the novelty. You can take seriously the names of people you don't remember, the references you can't follow, the small details that, to your mother, are the texture of a life she's now mostly carrying alone.

This won't fully restore what's been lost. It will, however, do a small amount of the witnessing work. The work is real. The work matters.

What I'm trying to do, with my own parents

I want to end on something practical, because I'm not sure I've succeeded at this myself, but I'm trying.

I have started, in the last year, asking my parents more questions about their own pasts. The years before I existed. The friends they had at twenty-five. The way the streets looked in the towns they grew up in. I have started, very slowly, trying to learn enough about their lives to function, in a small way, as one of the witnesses they will increasingly need.

I won't be a full witness. I wasn't there. I can't verify anything. But I can become a person who knows the references. A person who, when my mother mentions her old friend D from the nursing days, knows who D was and what happened to her. A person who, when my father tells the story of the car that broke down in 1974, has heard the story before and can finish the punchline.

This is, I want to be clear, a slightly unusual relationship for an adult son to cultivate with his parents. It involves listening to stories I have, in some cases, heard many times before, and listening to them as if they were new, because the listening itself is what makes them real. It involves asking questions I don't strictly need the answers to, because the asking is the thing that keeps my parents' pasts in active memory.

I am, in some small way, trying to become a piece of distributed long-term storage for them. To take on, while they're still here, some of the witnessing work that their own oldest friends used to do. The work won't fully fill the gap left by P. Nothing will. But it might, on the worst evenings, do a small amount of the holding that nobody else is in a position to do.

If you have aging parents whose oldest friends are dying or already dead, I'd suggest something similar. Not as a replacement. As a partial relief. Listen to the stories. Learn the names. Hold, in your own head, as much of their pasts as they're willing to hand you.

The loneliness of being the last witness to your own life is one of the heaviest forms of loneliness humans experience. It is not always preventable. It is, in some small measure, sharable, if the people who love the lonely person are willing to do the slow work of learning enough about them to bear some of the witnessing weight.

P died last spring. My mother still talks about her, often. I have started, in the last few months, knowing enough about P to ask the right follow-up questions when my mother brings her up.

It is a small thing. It is also, I'm coming to believe, one of the more important things I'm going to do in the next decade of my life.

Daniel Moran

Brown Brothers Media writer · Psychology, technology, and culture

Daniel Moran is a writer at Brown Brothers Media and one of the network’s top-performing contributors. He covers psychology, technology, and culture across multiple publications, including Silicon Canals, VegOut, and The Vessel.

Learn more on his Brown Brothers Media team page or connect on LinkedIn.

More Articles by Daniel

More From Vegout