For those who remember when "I'm fine" was the only acceptable answer and therapy meant you were "crazy," this journey through 1960s emotional unavailability reveals why an entire generation learned to bury their feelings—and how we're still unlearning those lessons today.
Remember those classic TV shows from the 60s? Father knows best, mom's in the kitchen with her pearls on, and nobody talks about feelings. If you grew up in that era, you know this wasn't just television fantasy. It was real life.
My parents, like most from that generation, showed love differently. My father, an engineer, expressed care through ensuring our financial stability. My mother, a teacher, demonstrated affection by making sure I had every educational opportunity possible. Hugs were brief. Deep conversations about emotions? They simply didn't happen.
Growing up as an only child in a middle-class suburb with high-achieving parents, I learned early that feelings were something you dealt with privately, if at all. And here's what strikes me most: nobody questioned it. This was just how adults were supposed to be.
1. Emotions were seen as weakness, not strength
Back then, crying was something you did behind closed doors. Men who showed vulnerability were considered soft. Women who expressed anger were hysterical.
The message was clear: keep it together, always. Parents didn't sit down with their kids to process disappointments or talk through anxieties. When you fell off your bike, you got told to shake it off. When your heart broke for the first time, you figured it out alone in your room.
I'll never forget sitting in a therapy session years later, tears streaming down my face for the first time in what felt like forever. The therapist asked me when I'd last cried like that. I couldn't remember. That moment taught me just how deeply I'd internalized the belief that showing emotion meant showing weakness.
The cost of this emotional suppression was enormous, though we couldn't see it then. Depression went undiagnosed. Anxiety manifested as "nerves." Trauma got buried under layers of silence and stoicism.
2. Children were meant to be seen, not heard (or comforted)
"Children should be seen and not heard." How many times did kids of the 60s hear that phrase? It wasn't just about keeping quiet at dinner parties. It reflected a fundamental belief about the parent-child relationship.
Parents provided shelter, food, education, discipline. But emotional support? That wasn't part of the job description. If you were scared of the dark, you were told to be brave. If you were worried about school, you got reminded that plenty of kids would love to have your opportunities.
This created a strange dynamic. We knew our parents loved us, but we also knew not to burden them with our feelings. Love was expressed through provision and protection, not through emotional availability or validation.
Looking back, I see how this shaped an entire generation's relationship with vulnerability. We learned to be self-sufficient emotionally because we had to be. But we also learned to disconnect from our own needs, to minimize our struggles, to soldier on regardless of how we felt inside.
3. Mental health was taboo
In the 60s, you didn't go to therapy unless something was seriously wrong with you. And by seriously wrong, I mean institutionalization-level wrong. Regular people didn't talk about anxiety or depression. Those words barely existed in everyday vocabulary.
If a neighbor had a "nervous breakdown," it was whispered about behind closed doors. Kids overheard fragments of these conversations but never the full story. Mental health struggles were shameful secrets, not challenges to be addressed with professional help.
My own parents never discussed their inner struggles with me growing up. It wasn't until decades later, when I finally had honest conversations with them about mental health, that I learned about my mother's battles with anxiety and my father's periods of depression. Breaking that generational silence felt revolutionary.
The stigma was so strong that people suffered in isolation rather than seek help. Self-medication through alcohol was more acceptable than seeing a psychiatrist. This left countless individuals struggling alone with conditions that could have been treated.
4. Parenting was about preparation, not connection
Parents in the 60s had a clear mission: prepare their children for the real world. This meant teaching practical skills, ensuring good grades, and instilling discipline. But emotional intelligence? That wasn't even a concept yet.
My parents, both highly educated, emphasized academic achievement above all else. Report cards were scrutinized. College preparation started early. But nobody taught us how to identify our emotions, communicate our needs, or build healthy relationships.
Dinner conversations centered on current events, school performance, or household logistics. "How are you feeling?" wasn't a common question. And if it was asked, "Fine" was the expected answer.
This approach made sense given what that generation had experienced. Many had parents who lived through the Great Depression and World War II. Survival and success were paramount. Emotional exploration seemed like an unnecessary luxury.
5. Love was shown through actions, not words
"I love you" wasn't something you heard daily in most 60s households. Love was assumed, demonstrated through actions rather than verbalized.
Fathers showed love by working long hours to provide. Mothers showed love by keeping an immaculate house and having dinner ready at 6 PM sharp. But sitting down for heart-to-heart conversations? That wasn't how affection was expressed.
As I learned growing up, my parents expressed love through concern about financial security. Every decision was filtered through the lens of economic stability. This was their way of saying "I love you and want you to be okay." But as a child, sometimes you just needed to hear the actual words.
This created a generation that struggled to express emotional intimacy. We knew how to do things for people we cared about, but talking about feelings remained uncomfortable territory well into adulthood.
Final thoughts
Looking back at the 60s approach to emotional availability, I feel both understanding and sadness. Understanding because I see how that generation was doing their best with the tools and knowledge they had. Sadness because I recognize the pain and disconnection this created.
The good news? We've learned so much since then. Today's parents are having conversations about feelings that would have been unthinkable in the 60s. Therapy is becoming normalized. Emotional intelligence is recognized as crucial for success and happiness.
But for those of us who grew up in that era, the work of unlearning those early lessons continues. We're teaching ourselves that vulnerability is courage, not weakness. That asking for emotional support is human, not burdensome. That our feelings matter and deserve attention.
If you recognize yourself in these descriptions, know that you're not alone. Many of us are still learning to be emotionally available to ourselves and others. And while we can't change how we were raised, we can change how we move forward.
The emotional unavailability of the 60s wasn't personal. It was cultural. Understanding this can be the first step toward healing and creating the emotional connections we wished we'd had growing up.
Just launched: Laughing in the Face of Chaos by Rudá Iandê
Exhausted from trying to hold it all together?
You show up. You smile. You say the right things. But under the surface, something’s tightening. Maybe you don’t want to “stay positive” anymore. Maybe you’re done pretending everything’s fine.
This book is your permission slip to stop performing. To understand chaos at its root and all of your emotional layers.
In Laughing in the Face of Chaos, Brazilian shaman Rudá Iandê brings over 30 years of deep, one-on-one work helping people untangle from the roles they’ve been stuck in—so they can return to something real. He exposes the quiet pressure to be good, be successful, be spiritual—and shows how freedom often lives on the other side of that pressure.
This isn’t a book about becoming your best self. It’s about becoming your real self.
