Why the words you choose—and how you use them—often reveal the way you think.
A confession from a lifelong word nerd: I didn’t fall in love with “big words.” I fell in love with right words—the ones that fit like a key in a lock. After years of writing, studying psychology, and geeking out on language research, I’ve noticed something quietly reliable: people who think clearly tend to speak and write clearly, and the breadcrumbs live in their vocabulary.
Not in pretentious jargon. Not in thesaurus flexing. In subtle patterns—choices you almost miss until you know what to look for.
Below are eight vocabulary patterns that linguistics and psycholinguistics research link to sharper thinking. None of these are IQ tests, and there’s huge variation across culture, class, and second-language experience. But if you’re aiming to sharpen your communication—and the thinking beneath it—these patterns are a powerful place to start.
1) A broad yet flexible vocabulary (not just “big words”)
People with stronger verbal ability tend to command more word types and repeat themselves less. Linguists measure this with lexical diversity—how varied your vocabulary is across a stretch of language. Robust indices like MTLD (Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity) capture this quality better than simple type–token ratios and have been validated across many samples. Put simply: the more precisely and variedly you can say what you mean (without padding), the easier it is for others to follow your thinking.
Personal note: When I’m tired, my vocabulary collapses into the same safe verbs—do, get, make. When I’m sharp, I naturally reach for distinguish, derive, reconcile. It’s not showing off; it’s accuracy.
2) Comfort with hedging and degrees of certainty
Highly literal speakers often treat words like on/off switches. More analytical speakers use hedges—lexical softeners like may, likely, roughly, tends to—to calibrate confidence and leave room for nuance. In academic writing, hedging is a hallmark of careful reasoning because it distinguishes claims from conclusions and signals the writer’s stance toward evidence.
Classic work in linguistics (e.g., Lakoff’s theory of hedges; Ken Hyland’s analysis of hedging in research prose) shows how such vocabulary encodes “fuzzy” categories and graded certainty—exactly what complex thinking requires.
In everyday talk, that might sound like: “This approach will probably get us there, but we’ll need to monitor the early data.” Not wishy-washy—precise.
3) An “analytic” function-word profile
It’s not only the nouns and verbs that matter. Subtle shifts in function words (articles, prepositions, pronouns, conjunctions) can reveal thinking style. Large-scale text analyses show that a more analytic pattern of small words—more articles and prepositions relative to pronouns and adverbs—predicts better academic outcomes years later. The finding isn’t about fancy vocabulary; it’s how people knit ideas together with the small connective tissue of language.
I notice this in my drafts. When I’m rushing, I write “I think… I feel… I want…” (pronoun-heavy). When I slow down to reason, I write “because, therefore, across, within, under, relative to”—words that structure thought.
4) Apt metaphors and analogies (used sparingly, used well)
Clever metaphors aren’t just pretty—they compress complexity. Psych research finds that producing novel, apt metaphors correlates with fluid intelligence (the capacity to reason with new information). That doesn’t mean every smart person speaks in similes; it means that when they reach for figurative language, it clarifies, not clouds.
Think of someone saying, “This market is less a ladder and more a set of moving escalators—you adjust your footing, or you drift.” The metaphor doesn’t decorate the point; it delivers it.
5) Audience-tuned word choice (register agility)
Linguists call it audience design: skilled communicators adjust vocabulary to context without diluting meaning. With experts, they’ll use domain terms; with a broader audience, they’ll define them or swap them for plain-English equivalents. This agility is partly explained by sociolinguistic theories like Communication Accommodation Theory and Bell’s audience-design model—your lexical choices subtly converge toward the listener to maximize clarity and rapport.
In my own writing, I’ll use “heterogeneous effects” in a research note, but in a general article I’ll say “the impact varies a lot by group.” Same idea, different register.
6) Lexical sophistication that fits the task
Smart vocabularies aren’t just rare—they’re appropriate. In computational linguistics, lexical sophistication refers to using lower-frequency or more specialized words when they serve the purpose.
Tools like TAALES track dozens of frequency and psycholinguistic indices and show that appropriate sophistication correlates with advanced proficiency and writing quality. The key is fit: photosynthesis belongs in a biology explanation; it doesn’t belong in a sandwich review.
If you want a quick self-test, ask: Does this word carry meaning I can’t easily replace with a simpler one? If not, simplify.
7) Control over abstract vs. concrete wording
Cognitively flexible speakers glide between concrete words (“door, coffee, thunder”) and abstract words (“justice, risk, evidence”) to match the goal: concretes to paint the scene, abstracts to generalize the lesson.
Large norming studies give us reliable concreteness ratings for tens of thousands of English words; educational and discourse tools (e.g., Coh-Metrix) even treat concreteness as one of the core dimensions that distinguishes texts and supports comprehension. People who do this well are essentially zooming their listener’s mental camera in and out at the right moments.
One trick I use: write a paragraph with concrete nouns only; rewrite it with one abstract sentence that captures the principle. Keep both. The braid of the two is powerful.
8) Causal and connective vocabulary that makes reasoning visible
Finally, listen for connectives—because, therefore, however, although, by contrast, consequently. These small words do heavy cognitive lifting: they signal causal links, contrasts, and constraints. Discourse-processing research (including extensive work with Coh-Metrix) shows that texts with clearer causal cohesion and well-placed connectives are easier to understand and often judged higher in quality, especially when the goal is analytic reasoning. Combined with the function-word profile in #3, they form the backbone of transparent thought.
When I edit, my first pass is just hunting for missing bridges: “How did we get from sentence A to sentence B?” If I can add “because…” and the paragraph immediately tightens, I know I’m on the right track.
How to cultivate these patterns (without sounding like a robot)
1) Read one level above your comfort zone. You’ll naturally absorb diverse, well-fitted vocabulary in context. Skim actively: What work is each word doing?
2) Rewrite once for register. Draft for yourself, then revise for your reader. Replace insider shorthand with plain terms (or define it once, then use it).
3) Add hedges where certainty isn’t earned. Try “likely, suggests, consistent with” when you’re making probabilistic claims—and remove them when you’re stating facts.
4) Use a “connective pass.” Before you ship an email or proposal, add because, therefore, however, by contrast where the logic bends. If a connective feels forced, your argument probably is.
5) Pair concrete with abstract. Tell the story (concrete), then state the model (abstract). Your reader gets the “why” and the “how it looks in the wild.”
6) Practice metaphor as translation, not decoration. Ask: What familiar thing works like this? Keep it short; test it on a friend; kill any metaphor that shows off more than it shows truth.
7) Track your tics. Everyone overuses certain words. Mine are actually and frankly. Once you see them, you can swap them for stronger, more specific terms.
8) Get feedback from two audiences. Ask an expert and a lay reader to mark any word they stumble on. If both stumble, it’s your problem, not theirs.
A quick reality check (and why this isn’t elitist)
Vocabulary reflects exposure and context. It’s shaped by schooling, profession, class, neurodiversity, and whether you’re speaking your first language. I live in Vietnam and toggle daily between English and Southern Vietnamese; the most “intelligent” thing I can do in many conversations is choose simpler words to be fully understood. Precision, not pretension, is the goal.
So consider these patterns less like a diagnostic and more like a practice. The real signal of intelligence isn’t ornate words. It’s the consistent ability to choose the next word that makes your thinking clearer—for yourself and for the person across the table.
When I catch a paragraph that finally breathes—hedges in the right spots, connectives doing their quiet work, a metaphor that unlocks a knotty idea—I feel the same satisfaction as when a long run clicks into rhythm. The language stops performing. It starts thinking with you.
That, to me, is the best kind of smart.
If You Were a Healing Herb, Which Would You Be?
Each herb holds a unique kind of magic — soothing, awakening, grounding, or clarifying.
This 9-question quiz reveals the healing plant that mirrors your energy right now and what it says about your natural rhythm.
✨ Instant results. Deeply insightful.
