There's solo travel, and then there's traveling alone to places most people won't even consider visiting.
What makes a traveler brave? Is it the distance they go, the discomfort they endure, or something else entirely?
I've been thinking about this question a lot lately, especially as solo travel becomes more mainstream. There are plenty of solo travel guides promoting "easy" destinations for first-timers, and that's fine. We all have to start somewhere.
But then there are the destinations that require something extra. Places where the infrastructure isn't set up for tourists, where language barriers are genuine obstacles, where you can't just Google your way out of every problem.
Today, I want to talk about eight countries that, if you've visited them solo, put you in a different category of traveler. These aren't the hardest places on Earth to visit, but they're not holding your hand either.
1) Iran
Solo travel to Iran requires navigating not just a different culture, but intense political perceptions and genuine safety considerations that change based on your nationality and gender.
The country itself is remarkably hospitable. Iranian people are famous for their warmth toward visitors, often going out of their way to help lost tourists.
But getting there and moving around requires dealing with visa complications, limited banking options due to sanctions, and constant awareness of local customs and laws.
For solo female travelers especially, Iran demands careful attention to dress codes and social norms that can feel restrictive. You're not just adapting to a new place, you're operating within a completely different framework of what's acceptable and legal.
The reward is access to one of the world's most historically rich and architecturally stunning countries. But make no mistake, choosing to go there alone means accepting a level of complexity that most destinations don't require.
2) Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea doesn't make it onto many travel bucket lists, and there's a reason for that. The infrastructure is minimal, crime rates in urban areas are genuinely concerning, and outside the main tourist areas, you're largely on your own.
This is not a country where you can wing it. Solo travelers need to plan meticulously, often hiring local guides for safety, and maintaining constant situational awareness. The usual solo travel freedoms like wandering neighborhoods or taking spontaneous public transport often aren't realistic options.
What draws people there despite these challenges is the incredible cultural diversity and untouched natural environments. It's one of the least explored countries on Earth, home to hundreds of distinct tribal groups and languages.
But accessing that experience solo requires accepting real risks and doing extensive research. This isn't Instagram-friendly adventure travel. It's serious expedition-level planning for everyday movement.
3) Afghanistan
I'll be direct: traveling to Afghanistan solo right now is not something I'd recommend to most people, and the few travelers who do go are working with extensive local contacts and security considerations.
Even before recent political changes, Afghanistan required solo travelers to operate with extreme caution, detailed planning, and often security support.
The warmth and hospitality of Afghan people is legendary among those who've visited, but the reality is that safety infrastructure for tourists is essentially nonexistent.
The travelers who go there solo tend to be either journalists, aid workers, or extremely experienced adventurers with deep knowledge of the region. They're not going for leisure tourism in any conventional sense.
Including it on this list isn't meant to romanticize dangerous travel. It's acknowledging that the handful of people who do travel there alone are operating at a completely different level of risk tolerance and preparation than typical solo travelers.
4) Yemen
Yemen presents similar challenges to Afghanistan, amplified by ongoing conflict and a humanitarian crisis. The country is effectively off-limits for conventional tourism, and the few outsiders there are typically working with organizations or have very specific reasons for being there.
Before the conflict, Yemen was known for its ancient architecture, unique cultural heritage, and the warmth of its people. Solo travelers who visited during more stable periods talk about it as one of the most rewarding and challenging experiences of their lives.
Currently, travel there requires not just bravery but extensive planning, local connections, and acceptance of serious danger. This isn't a place where you can just show up and figure it out.
The point of including Yemen isn't to suggest people should go. It's to recognize that the travelers who've been there solo, particularly recently, have navigated circumstances that would stop most people before they even started planning.
5) North Korea
North Korea is a completely different kind of challenge. You're not navigating danger in the conventional sense, but rather surrendering almost all autonomy in exchange for access to one of the world's most closed societies.
Solo travelers to North Korea must go on organized tours with government-approved guides who accompany them constantly. You can't wander freely, can't have spontaneous interactions with locals, and are shown only what the government wants you to see.
What makes this brave isn't physical danger but the willingness to travel under such restrictive conditions. You're paying significant money to have almost no freedom of movement, knowing that everything you experience is curated propaganda.
Some travelers justify this by saying the only way to understand the country is to see it firsthand. Others argue that tourism there supports an oppressive regime. Either way, choosing to go solo requires grappling with serious ethical questions on top of the practical challenges.
6) Somalia
Somalia's reputation for instability and piracy has defined how outsiders perceive it for decades, and while some regions have improved, solo travel there remains extremely challenging and genuinely dangerous.
The autonomous region of Somaliland is more stable and has seen a small trickle of adventurous travelers. But even there, solo tourists need local guides, careful planning, and awareness that tourist infrastructure barely exists.
Southern Somalia and areas controlled by various factions are effectively no-go zones for conventional travelers. The few outsiders there are journalists or aid workers with security support and extensive local knowledge.
Travelers who've been to Somalia solo talk about the incredible resilience and entrepreneurial spirit of Somali people, the beautiful coastline, and the fascinating cultural heritage. But they also acknowledge that accessing any of that requires accepting risks that most travelers aren't willing or able to manage.
7) Central African Republic
The Central African Republic rarely appears in travel discussions at all, which tells you something about its accessibility. Ongoing conflict, minimal infrastructure, and serious safety concerns make it one of the least visited countries on Earth.
Solo travelers who go there typically have very specific reasons like research, aid work, or documentary projects. Leisure tourism in any recognizable form doesn't really exist.
The few travel accounts from CAR describe a country of remarkable natural beauty and cultural richness that's been devastated by instability. But they also make clear that visiting requires extensive preparation, local contacts, and willingness to accept significant discomfort and risk.
This is not a destination where normal solo travel advice applies. You're not figuring out hostels and bus routes. You're coordinating security, limited flight options, and complex logistics just to move around.
8) Libya
Libya's situation has fluctuated over the years, but it remains a challenging destination where solo travel requires serious consideration of security risks and limited infrastructure.
Before the 2011 revolution, Libya was starting to open up to tourism. Travelers visited ancient Roman ruins at Leptis Magna and explored the Sahara. That brief window of easier access is long gone.
Currently, the country is divided between competing governments and armed groups. The travelers who go there solo tend to have experience in conflict zones and work extensively with local contacts to manage safety concerns.
What makes Libya particularly complex is that danger isn't uniform across the country. Some areas are relatively stable while others are active conflict zones. Solo travelers need current, detailed intelligence that goes far beyond typical travel research.
Conclusion
If you've traveled solo to any of these countries, you've done something that the vast majority of travelers will never attempt.
These aren't destinations you stumble into. They require research, preparation, risk acceptance, and often a willingness to operate without the safety nets we take for granted in more tourist-friendly places.
I want to be clear that I'm not romanticizing dangerous travel or suggesting these destinations should be on everyone's bucket list. Some of them shouldn't be visited at all right now, and others require levels of preparation and experience that casual travelers simply don't have.
But for those who have made these journeys solo, there's a recognition that you've navigated challenges most travelers never face.
You've operated without guidebooks, tourist infrastructure, or English-language help. You've made complex decisions about safety and ethics. You've figured things out when there was no easy answer.
That's not just bravery. It's a completely different category of travel experience.
If You Were a Healing Herb, Which Would You Be?
Each herb holds a unique kind of magic — soothing, awakening, grounding, or clarifying.
This 9-question quiz reveals the healing plant that mirrors your energy right now and what it says about your natural rhythm.
✨ Instant results. Deeply insightful.
