In megachurches across America, congregations are giving standing ovations to deepfake prophets—and creating a permission structure for something darker.
Editor's Note: This article examines the use of AI-generated content following the September 10, 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk. As this is a developing situation with ongoing legal proceedings and evolving social implications, some details may change. Last updated: September 30, 2025.
Last Sunday, I watched 7,000 Christians give a standing ovation to a dead man.
I'd gone to Prestonwood Baptist Church in Texas after seeing clips online of what was happening there. Eleven days after Charlie Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University, Pastor Jack Graham was playing an audio recording for his congregation. "Hear what Charlie is saying regarding what happened to him this past week," Graham said—present tense, as if Kirk was calling in from heaven.
What filled the megachurch wasn't Kirk's voice, exactly. It was artificial intelligence trained on hundreds of hours of his podcasts, generating what he might say about his own death. "Dry your tears, pick up your cross, and get back in the fight," the synthetic voice commanded. When it finished, thousands rose to their feet and applauded.
Three churches played this same recording that morning: Prestonwood in Texas, Dream City Church in Arizona, and Awaken Church in California. The speed was remarkable—within hours of Kirk's September 10 shooting, his digital resurrection had already begun.
Who Charlie Kirk was—and wasn't
For those unfamiliar with Kirk: At 31, he'd built Turning Point USA from a dorm room idea into a conservative youth empire with $100 million in annual revenue. He debated college students at "Prove Me Wrong" events, generating viral clips that made him a hero to young conservatives and a villain to progressives.
Kirk pushed conspiracy theories about "great replacement," claimed Democrats support "everything God hates," and made statements about race that drew widespread condemnation. When George Floyd was murdered, Kirk called him a "scumbag." He said "prowling blacks go around for fun to target white people." In a cruel irony, he was discussing mass shootings in America when Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old reportedly motivated by concerns about LGBTQ rights, killed him with a single shot from a rooftop 142 yards away.
But that Charlie Kirk—the person with documented views and a controversial record—is already disappearing.
The AI content began immediately. Kirk taking selfies in heaven with Lincoln and JFK. Kirk embracing Jesus. Kirk with angel wings comforting other conservative martyrs. One widely shared image shows him hugging Martin Luther King Jr., whom the real Kirk had criticized while alive.
The machinery of digital resurrection
To understand what's happening, you need to know about AI slop—the flood of synthetic images clogging social media. Shrimp Jesus. Fake disaster victims. Content farms generating whatever triggers engagement. The MAGA movement had already embraced this aesthetic before Kirk's death, with Trump himself posting AI-generated images of opponents.
Voice cloning technology now allows anyone to replicate speech with minutes of audio. Companies like ElevenLabs can create convincing vocal replicas from podcast recordings. Feed that voice clone a ChatGPT-generated script answering "What would Charlie Kirk say about his own death?" and you've created a prophet who speaks forever.
Kirk's death coincided with escalating rhetoric from Trump administration officials. At his memorial service—which drew over 100,000 to State Farm Stadium—Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared this wasn't political but "spiritual war." Vice President JD Vance said it wasn't a funeral but a "revival." Jack Posobiec held up a rosary asking if the crowd was ready to "put on the full armor of God."
Into this charged moment drops technology that resurrects martyrs on demand. The AI Kirk doesn't memorialize—it mobilizes. The synthesized voice tells followers that death can't stop the movement, that the fight continues, that heaven itself endorses their cause.
When martyrs never stop talking
Black clergy have offered pointed theological criticism. Rev. Howard-John Wesley of Alfred Street Baptist Church delivered a sermon that spread widely online: "You do not become a hero in your death when you are a weapon of the enemy in your life." His core argument: "How you die does not redeem how you lived."
Rev. Jamal Bryant of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church warned against "trying to remix a life of racism and white supremacy that went forth unchecked." Catholic theologian Father Raymond J. de Souza noted in the National Catholic Register that Kirk wasn't killed "in hatred of the faith" but for political reasons—a crucial distinction for authentic martyrdom.
The AI resurrections erase these complexities. They transform a divisive political figure into an eternal saint who says whatever programmers want. The technology doesn't preserve Kirk's actual views; it creates new ones tailored to current needs.
Dr. Matthew Taylor, who studies religious extremism at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies, explains that spiritual warfare language creates "permission structures for violence" by framing opponents as demonically possessed. The AI element adds another layer—now the martyrs themselves appear to endorse continued conflict.
According to researchers tracking political violence, 2025 has already seen a dramatic spike in attacks. Dr. Arie Perliger of UMass Lowell warns: "Political assassinations come in waves... they create a process of escalation that encourages others on the extreme political spectrum to feel the need to retaliate."
The human cost of synthetic grief
On TikTok, I found influencer Taylor Diazmercado crying while listening to AI Kirk. She'd labeled the audio clearly as artificial, yet wept as if hearing his actual voice. Her caption: "What a man." The video garnered 123,000 likes in days.
This willingness to embrace obvious fabrications reveals something unsettling. We're not being deceived—we're choosing to participate. The congregation at Prestonwood knew they were hearing AI. They applauded anyway.
These images spread beyond social media. They get embedded in websites, indexed by search engines, potentially used to train future AI systems. Each iteration could drift further from reality, creating what researchers call a "model collapse" where AI trains on AI-generated content in an endless loop of distortion.
One viral creation shows Kirk with Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee killed in North Carolina, both sprouting angel wings on the bus where she died. The visual markers of AI are obvious—unnatural lighting, distorted hands, that synthetic shimmer. Yet millions share these images as if they carry spiritual significance.
The real choice ahead
Perhaps the most painful contrast comes from Kirk's widow, Erika. At his memorial service, she offered radical Christian forgiveness: "I forgive him," she said of the shooter. "The answer to hate is not hate. The answer we know from the Gospel is love—always love."
This moment of genuine grace barely registered online. Forgiveness doesn't generate engagement. Love doesn't trend like war. While Erika Kirk called for healing, AI versions of her husband were being programmed to call for battle.
Rev. Chris Pritchett of Mount Olympus Presbyterian Church in Utah wrote to his congregation: "I am weary of a culture where people see each other as enemies instead of neighbors. And I am weary of a world where guns and gall take the place of dialogue and dignity."
Yet moderate voices struggle to compete with algorithmic amplification of extremes. Governor Spencer Cox, who chairs the National Governors Association's "Disagree Better" campaign, posed a stark choice: "Do we escalate or do we find an off-ramp? Every one of us gets to make that choice."
What we're choosing
Three weeks after Kirk's assassination, America faces what experts call an inflection point. Tyler Robinson awaits trial on charges including capital murder. The prosecutor says he faces the death penalty. Meanwhile, political violence continues escalating, with researchers documenting nearly double the attacks compared to last year.
The AI resurrection of Charlie Kirk represents something new in this cycle—the ability to make the dead speak forever, saying whatever serves current purposes. The technology transforms grief into content, martyrs into chatbots, memory into manipulation.
Catholic theologians distinguish between dying for faith and dying while having faith. Liberation theologians define martyrdom as nonviolent resistance to tyranny. Reformed traditions warn against valorizing any political death. But theological precision matters little against algorithmic momentum.
The real Charlie Kirk is gone. What remains isn't memory but manufacture, not legacy but programming. Every Sunday, in churches across America, congregations listen to voices of the dead created by machines. They rise and applaud.
An algorithm notices the engagement. It prepares to generate more.
If You Were a Healing Herb, Which Would You Be?
Each herb holds a unique kind of magic — soothing, awakening, grounding, or clarifying.
This 9-question quiz reveals the healing plant that mirrors your energy right now and what it says about your natural rhythm.
✨ Instant results. Deeply insightful.
