When you have spent decades being the expert in the room, your identity and your competence become deeply intertwined. Your skill is part of how you understand yourself.
Add VegOut to your Google News feed. 
Robert had spent thirty-one years as a surgeon.
Precise. Authoritative. Unquestionably competent. In the operating theatre, he was the person everyone looked to. His hands didn’t shake. His decisions didn’t waver. He had earned, across three decades of practice, a kind of mastery that very few people ever reach.
He retired at sixty-seven and, six months later, enrolled in a pottery class.
He was terrible at it.
The clay went everywhere. His bowls collapsed. A twelve-year-old in the Tuesday afternoon children’s class produced more convincing work in her first session than Robert managed in his first month. He told me he drove home after that first lesson with his hands still grey with clay dust, feeling something he hadn’t felt since medical school.
Completely, humiliatingly, wonderfully out of his depth.
“I nearly didn’t go back,” he said. “Every part of me wanted to find something I’d be good at immediately. Something that matched who I’d been.”
He went back. And what happened over the following year surprised him more than anything in his retirement.
The identity trap of late-life mastery
Robert’s instinct — to avoid anything that might expose incompetence — is not weakness. It is, according to developmental psychologists, one of the most predictable responses to the transition out of a high-mastery career.
When you have spent decades being the expert in the room, your identity and your competence become deeply intertwined. You are not just a person who happens to be skilled at what you do. Your skill is part of how you understand yourself. It is woven into how others see you, how you move through the world, and how you quietly measure your own worth.
Then retirement arrives. The expertise remains, but the daily stage for it is gone. And many people respond, without quite realising it, by gravitating only toward things they can already do well. Familiar activities. Safe hobbies. Pursuits that confirm the existing story rather than risk disrupting it.
It feels like caution. It feels like self-awareness, even. But developmental psychologists have a different name for it.
They call it identity foreclosure — the premature closing-off of who you might still become, in order to protect who you have already been.
The willingness to be a beginner again, after decades of mastery, is not a step backward. It is one of the bravest things a person can do in the second half of life.
What the research actually says about learning in later life
Here is what makes this genuinely fascinating from a neuroscience perspective.
The discomfort Robert felt in that pottery class — the awkwardness, the exposure, the gap between who he had been and who he currently was in that room — was not a sign that something was wrong. It was a sign that his brain was doing exactly what it needs to do to grow.
Neuroscientists have established that genuine learning — the kind that builds new neural pathways rather than simply reinforcing existing ones — requires a state of productive struggle. When we attempt something we cannot yet do, the brain is forced to form new connections rather than simply activating familiar ones. The discomfort is not incidental to the learning. It is the mechanism of it.
Dr Carol Dweck’s landmark research on growth mindset demonstrated that people who embrace challenge and tolerate the discomfort of not-yet-knowing consistently outperform those who avoid it — at any age. But her later work, and the work of developmental psychologists who followed, suggests something even more specific: in the second half of life, the willingness to tolerate incompetence in service of growth becomes increasingly rare, and increasingly important.
Because the alternative — the slow narrowing of life around what you already know — has a cost that compounds quietly over years.
The courage nobody talks about
We tend to celebrate a particular kind of courage in later life. The courage to face illness. The courage to grieve. The courage to accept what cannot be changed.
These are real and worthy forms of courage.
But developmental psychologists point to another kind that receives far less attention — and that may be just as demanding.
The courage to be seen not knowing. To sit in a room full of people who are better than you at something, and to stay there. To produce work that is clumsy and unfinished and nothing like the standards you held yourself to for four decades. To let the gap between your current performance and your own expectations be visible to others.
For high achievers — for surgeons and principals and executives and anyone who built a life around being excellent at something — this is genuinely difficult in a way that is hard to overstate. The ego investment in competence is enormous. The habit of self-assessment against high standards is deeply grooved. Being a beginner doesn’t just feel uncomfortable. It can feel like a kind of self-betrayal.
Which is precisely why it takes courage. Not the absence of discomfort. The decision to act in spite of it.
What happens when people choose it anyway
Robert kept going to the pottery class.
Not because he was getting remarkably better — although he was, slowly. But because something unexpected was happening alongside the learning.
He was becoming lighter.
The particular heaviness that can settle on very accomplished people — the weight of always having to perform at the level of their reputation, the vigilance required to maintain the appearance of certainty — began to lift. In the pottery studio, nobody knew he had been a surgeon. Nobody expected precision from him. He was just a man in an apron whose bowls kept collapsing, and that was fine.
“I hadn’t realised how much energy I was spending,” he told me. “Just on maintaining the image of someone who knew what he was doing. Even in retirement. Even when there was nothing left to maintain it for.”
This is what developmental psychologists describe as ego transcendence — the gradual loosening of the self’s grip on its own story. It doesn’t mean losing yourself. It means becoming spacious enough to hold a new version of yourself alongside the old one.
And it turns out that one of the most reliable paths into that spaciousness is precisely the one that feels most threatening: choosing to be incompetent at something, voluntarily and publicly, and discovering that you survive it.
The question of what to try
The what matters less than the willingness.
It doesn’t have to be pottery. It doesn’t have to be dramatic or impressive or aligned with any vision of who you are becoming. It simply has to be something genuinely new. Something that puts you back at the beginning, in a room where others know more than you, where your decades of expertise are irrelevant, where the only currency is showing up and trying.
Language learning. Painting. Singing in a community choir. Sailing. Woodworking. Improv theatre. Wild swimming. Anything that makes you feel, at least initially, like you have no idea what you are doing.
The research on what makes this most effective points to one factor above all others: repetition in community. Not learning alone, where the ego can hide. But learning alongside others, where the vulnerability is shared and the accountability is gentle and the experience of being a beginner is normalised by the fact that everyone around you is also, in some way, working something out.
What Robert found at the end of the year
Twelve months after his first pottery lesson, Robert’s bowls were still not particularly good.
He didn’t care.
He had, in that year, made six friends he would not otherwise have met. He had spent fifty Tuesday evenings completely absorbed in something that had nothing to do with medicine, reputation, or legacy. He had experienced, regularly and reliably, the particular pleasure of being fully present to a task that demanded all of his attention and none of his identity.
And he had discovered something he told me he wished someone had said to him before he retired.
“The best thing about being bad at something new,” he said, “is that you’re only ever competing with yourself. There’s no bar set by who you used to be. There’s just today’s attempt, and tomorrow’s.”
That is not regression.
That is one of the freest things a person can experience.
And it is available to anyone willing to be, just for a while, beautifully, courageously incompetent.
Free Guide: A Guide to Thriving in Your Retirement Years
If Robert’s story resonated with you — if you’re navigating who you are in this next chapter and what you want it to feel like — my free guide was written for exactly this moment.
Inside you’ll discover the 3 critical transition phases of retirement, how to navigate the emotional shifts with confidence rather than being blindsided, and powerful reflection prompts to help you design a retirement that feels authentically yours.
You’ll walk away with clarity, reassurance that what you’re feeling is completely normal, and practical steps to move into your next chapter with purpose. Download it here.
What’s Your Plant-Powered Archetype?
Ever wonder what your everyday habits say about your deeper purpose—and how they ripple out to impact the planet?
This 90-second quiz reveals the plant-powered role you’re here to play, and the tiny shift that makes it even more powerful.
12 fun questions. Instant results. Surprisingly accurate.
