Go to the main content

Psychology says people who were raised in the 1950s and 1960s developed these 9 inner strengths that are rare today

My grandmother was born in 1942. She raised four kids on a teacher's salary, and when I was sick with the flu in college, she drove six hours just to bring me soup. What strikes me most about her generation isn't just their kindness but their quiet resilience. There's something different about people raised in […]

Lifestyle

My grandmother was born in 1942. She raised four kids on a teacher's salary, and when I was sick with the flu in college, she drove six hours just to bring me soup. What strikes me most about her generation isn't just their kindness but their quiet resilience. There's something different about people raised in […]

Add VegOut to your Google News feed.

My grandmother was born in 1942. She raised four kids on a teacher's salary, and when I was sick with the flu in college, she drove six hours just to bring me soup. What strikes me most about her generation isn't just their kindness but their quiet resilience.

There's something different about people raised in the 1950s and 1960s. They possess a particular kind of mental toughness that doesn't announce itself. It shows up in how they handle disappointment, navigate challenges, and stay steady when things fall apart.

Psychology research is now revealing what many of us have observed: that era shaped people in ways that developed specific inner strengths. Not because life was easier back then, but because it was harder in particular ways.

Today we're exploring nine psychological strengths commonly found in people raised during this period. These aren't just nostalgic observations. They're genuine capabilities that research shows are becoming increasingly rare.

1) They developed tolerance for boredom

Kids in the 1950s and 1960s spent hours with nothing but their imagination.

Three TV channels. No internet. No smartphones. If nothing was on television, you read a book, went outside, or sat with your thoughts until something interesting occurred to you.

This wasn't just about finding entertainment. It was training the brain to generate ideas rather than constantly consume them.

Psychologist Sandi Mann's research shows that boredom actually strengthens creativity, patience, and problem-solving. When the mind isn't overstimulated, it's forced to become resourceful.

I watch this play out when the WiFi goes down at my local coffee shop. People my age immediately get restless, checking our phones repeatedly. The older regulars? They just keep reading their newspapers or strike up conversations without missing a beat.

That capacity to sit with empty moments without immediately reaching for distraction is a psychological strength we're losing fast.

2) Physical discomfort didn't feel catastrophic

Walking to school in all weather wasn't a hardship story. It was just Tuesday.

Kids in this era helped with physically demanding chores, played outside until dark, and didn't have climate-controlled comfort at their fingertips. They got cold, tired, hot, and sore regularly.

According to psychological research, this built something called "stress inoculation." By regularly experiencing manageable physical challenges, children developed confidence in their ability to handle discomfort.

They learned that being uncomfortable wasn't an emergency requiring immediate intervention.

Compare that to today's world where we've engineered most physical discomfort out of our lives. We've created a generation that experiences minor inconvenience as genuine distress because they've never had to build tolerance for it.

3) They mastered delayed gratification

Want to talk to a friend? Walk to their house or wait until you saw them at school. Want a new toy? Save up for months. Want to know something? Go to the library.

Everything required patience.

The famous Stanford marshmallow experiment in the 1970s tested children's ability to delay gratification by offering them one marshmallow now or two if they waited. Follow-up studies found that kids who could wait had better life outcomes across nearly every measure.

Here's the thing: children of the 1950s and 1960s were essentially living that experiment daily. Waiting wasn't optional. It was built into the fabric of life.

They developed the understanding that good things take time, that anticipation has value, and that immediate gratification isn't always the goal.

In our current world of same-day delivery and instant streaming, this capacity to wait patiently for meaningful rewards is becoming almost countercultural.

4) They learned resourcefulness through limitation

When something broke, you fixed it. When you needed entertainment, you created it. When you wanted something, you figured out how to make it work with what you had.

I think about this when I'm cooking in my Venice Beach apartment. If I'm missing an ingredient for a recipe, my first instinct is to order it online. My grandmother would just substitute something else and move on.

Psychologically, this reflects problem-focused coping. Instead of spiraling into stress about what's missing, you take practical action with available resources.

This builds competence. And competence builds confidence.

People raised in this era learned that not every inconvenience requires an upgrade, not every problem requires a purchase. That "make do" mindset is almost rebellious in our consumption-driven culture, but it creates genuine mental strength.

5) Unstructured independence built self-reliance

"Be home before dark."

That was often the extent of parental supervision. Kids left the house in the morning, sorted out their own disputes, figured out how to entertain themselves, and navigated neighborhood dynamics without constant adult intervention.

For many from difficult homes, this independence was even more pronounced. They had to learn self-care because there wasn't always someone available to help.

This wasn't neglect in most cases. It was the cultural norm. And it built what psychologists call resilience through mastery: the confidence that comes from overcoming challenges independently.

Today's heavily scheduled, constantly supervised childhoods don't provide the same opportunities. We've created a generation that struggles with basic independence because they've never had to practice it.

6) Face-to-face social friction built emotional intelligence

There was no hiding behind screens. No carefully crafted texts. No emoji to soften awkward conversations.

People raised in the 1950s and 1960s learned social skills through unfiltered, face-to-face interaction. They negotiated conflicts in person, made phone calls without scripts, and learned to read body language, tone, and the uncomfortable silences that reveal what people really mean.

When I first started freelancing for VegOutMag, I dreaded making phone calls. I'd draft elaborate emails instead. But I've noticed older editors and writers just pick up the phone. No anxiety, no script. They learned those skills through daily practice.

Psychologists say this type of direct social interaction strengthens emotional intelligence because the brain had to develop sophisticated people-reading skills.

Today's curated communication is more comfortable, but it doesn't always build the same resilience for handling real human friction.

7) Immediate consequences taught personal responsibility

When you made a mistake, things happened fast and in real life.

Broke something? You owned it. Got in trouble at school? The teacher called home and consequences followed you through the door. Said something hurtful? You saw the impact on someone's face immediately.

According to research on generational brain development, this built what psychologists call an internal locus of control—the belief that your actions directly shape your outcomes.

Today's kids might get a notification, a warning screen, or a parent immediately intervening to smooth things over. The connection between action and consequence is often buffered or delayed.

People who learned through immediate feedback developed a keen sense of personal accountability that serves them throughout life.

8) Emotional regulation without constant validation

If you fell and scraped your knee, you dusted yourself off and kept playing. If something upset you, you learned to manage it quietly.

This wasn't always healthy. Some people from this era were taught to suppress emotions in damaging ways. But many developed what psychologists call emotional regulation: the ability to feel deeply without letting emotions hijack behavior.

They learned that feelings pass, difficulties don't last forever, and they had inner strength to weather storms.

Modern culture sometimes implies that strong feelings require immediate action or external validation. But real strength is often the opposite: feeling the wave, then choosing your response.

When my partner and I had our first major disagreement about our kitchen setup—he wanted his pepperoni pizza supplies easily accessible while I wanted the shared space to feel more plant-based—I immediately wanted to text three friends about it. He just suggested we talk it through over dinner. That capacity to sit with discomfort and work through it directly is something his parents' generation seemed to have in abundance.

9) Community reliance built genuine connection

Neighborhoods functioned differently in the 1950s and 1960s. People knew their neighbors, relied on each other for help, and participated in community life by necessity, not choice.

This wasn't always idyllic. But it built something valuable: the understanding that we need each other, that isolation is dangerous, and that genuine relationships require showing up even when it's inconvenient.

People raised in this era often have deeper roots in their communities. They're more likely to know their neighbors' names, participate in local activities, and understand reciprocity as a way of life.

In our current culture of digital connection and physical isolation, this embodied sense of community is rare. We have thousands of online connections but often don't know the person living next door.

Conclusion

These nine strengths aren't exclusive to people born in a particular decade. Anyone can develop them with intention and practice.

The point isn't to idealize the past or suggest everything was better back then. The 1950s and 1960s had serious problems we've rightfully moved beyond.

But we can learn from the conditions that shaped this generation's resilience.

We can practice sitting with boredom instead of immediately reaching for our phones. We can fix things instead of replacing them. We can have difficult conversations face-to-face rather than hiding behind screens. We can let our kids experience manageable challenges without immediately intervening.

The strengths developed by people raised in the 1950s and 1960s weren't accidents. They were the natural result of an environment that demanded patience, resourcefulness, and resilience.

We can't recreate that world. But we can choose to cultivate those same qualities in ourselves and the next generation. The good news? These psychological muscles can still be built. They just require us to deliberately embrace some of the friction we've spent decades trying to eliminate.

 

If You Were a Healing Herb, Which Would You Be?

Each herb holds a unique kind of magic — soothing, awakening, grounding, or clarifying.
This 9-question quiz reveals the healing plant that mirrors your energy right now and what it says about your natural rhythm.

✨ Instant results. Deeply insightful.

Jordan Cooper

Jordan Cooper is a pop-culture writer and vegan-snack reviewer with roots in music blogging. Known for approachable, insightful prose, Jordan connects modern trends—from K-pop choreography to kombucha fermentation—with thoughtful food commentary. In his downtime, he enjoys photography, experimenting with fermentation recipes, and discovering new indie music playlists.

More Articles by Jordan

More From Vegout